Review



18 amino acid secretion signal peptide  (Addgene inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Addgene inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Addgene inc 18 amino acid secretion signal peptide
    ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing <t>an</t> <t>N-terminal</t> <t>18-amino-acid</t> signal peptide <t>(SEC1).</t> ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .
    18 Amino Acid Secretion Signal Peptide, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/18 amino acid secretion signal peptide/product/Addgene inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 8 article reviews
    18 amino acid secretion signal peptide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "A Nanobody-Based Toolbox to Probe ApoE4 in the Secretory Pathway and Cytosol"

    Article Title: A Nanobody-Based Toolbox to Probe ApoE4 in the Secretory Pathway and Cytosol

    Journal: Cells

    doi: 10.3390/cells15050479

    ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing an N-terminal 18-amino-acid signal peptide (SEC1). ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .
    Figure Legend Snippet: ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing an N-terminal 18-amino-acid signal peptide (SEC1). ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .

    Techniques Used: Construct, Sequencing, Expressing, Microscopy, Standard Deviation, Transformation Assay, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Transfection, Western Blot, Control



    Similar Products

    94
    InvivoGen lucia luciferase signal peptide
    Lucia Luciferase Signal Peptide, supplied by InvivoGen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/lucia luciferase signal peptide/product/InvivoGen
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    lucia luciferase signal peptide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd e3142hu
    E3142hu, supplied by Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/e3142hu/product/Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    e3142hu - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Sangon Biotech signal peptide
    Signal Peptide, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/signal peptide/product/Sangon Biotech
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    signal peptide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Addgene inc 18 amino acid secretion signal peptide
    ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing <t>an</t> <t>N-terminal</t> <t>18-amino-acid</t> signal peptide <t>(SEC1).</t> ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .
    18 Amino Acid Secretion Signal Peptide, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/18 amino acid secretion signal peptide/product/Addgene inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    18 amino acid secretion signal peptide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology elisa kit
    ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing <t>an</t> <t>N-terminal</t> <t>18-amino-acid</t> signal peptide <t>(SEC1).</t> ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .
    Elisa Kit, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/elisa kit/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Moderna jev signal peptide sequence
    ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing <t>an</t> <t>N-terminal</t> <t>18-amino-acid</t> signal peptide <t>(SEC1).</t> ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .
    Jev Signal Peptide Sequence, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/jev signal peptide sequence/product/Moderna
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    jev signal peptide sequence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Elabscience Biotechnology enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa kit kit human scube 1 elisa kit
    ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing <t>an</t> <t>N-terminal</t> <t>18-amino-acid</t> signal peptide <t>(SEC1).</t> ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .
    Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Elisa Kit Kit Human Scube 1 Elisa Kit, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa kit kit human scube 1 elisa kit/product/Elabscience Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa kit kit human scube 1 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing an N-terminal 18-amino-acid signal peptide (SEC1). ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .

    Journal: Cells

    Article Title: A Nanobody-Based Toolbox to Probe ApoE4 in the Secretory Pathway and Cytosol

    doi: 10.3390/cells15050479

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ER-targeted apoE nanobodies 9-74, 19-38, 17-69 and 18-91 bind apoE4 intracellularly and promote its intracellular retention in HEK293T cells. ( A ) Schematic representation of the ER-targeted nanobody construct containing an N-terminal mouse IgH secretion signal peptide (SEC2), a C-terminal HA-tag, and a KDEL ER retention sequence. ( B ) ApoE4 expression construct containing an N-terminal 18-amino-acid signal peptide (SEC1). ( C ) Schematic depiction of cells expressing apoE4 and an ER-targeted apoE nanobody. The KDEL-equipped nanobody is directed to the ER, allowing its interaction with apoE4 as it passes through the secretory pathway. ( D ) Microscopy images showing colocalization (yellow) of apoE4 (green) and ER-targeted nanobodies (Nb-KDEL; red) in HEK293T cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. ( E ) Scatter dot plot of the averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC averaged ) values quantifying colocalization between apoE4 and each ER-targeted nanobody. Each dot represents the average PCC value of one independent experiment (~15 cells per experiment). Black horizontal lines and error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation (SD; n = 3). All nanobodies displayed PCC averaged values significantly greater than 0.5 (red dotted line) and approaching 1, indicative of strong colocalization (Fisher Z-transformation followed by a one-sample t -test against a reference value of 0.5). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ( F ) Co-IP assays showing interaction between each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies (Nb-KDEL) and apoE4 in cell extracts of co-transfected HEK293T cells (lanes 6). Co-IP was performed using anti-HA agarose beads and analyzed by Western blot. Two negative controls were included: NC1, a co-IP using the extract of cells transfected with apoE4 alone (lanes 4), and NC2, a co-IP using the extract of cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody (lanes 5). For each condition, the corresponding input (cell extract) is shown (lanes 1–3). Uncropped blots are shown in . ( G ) Western blot analysis showing increased apoE4 levels in cell extracts (left) and reduced apoE4 levels in conditioned medium (right) from HEK293T cells co-transfected with apoE4 and each of the ER-targeted apoE nanobodies, compared to cells co-transfected with apoE4 and an ER-targeted GFP nanobody control. Actin was used as a loading control. Uncropped versions of the shown blots, together with replicate blots (n = 3), are provided in . ( H ) Quantification of intracellular apoE4 levels (cell extract Western blots). ApoE4 levels were normalized to actin and expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in . ( I ) Quantification of secreted apoE4 levels (conditioned medium Western blots). ApoE4 levels were expressed relative to the GFP nanobody control within each blot/replicate. Individual data points are shown as dots (n = 3); bars represent mean ± SD. Raw data are provided in .

    Article Snippet: The pCMV4-ApoE4 plasmid, encoding apoE4 with an N-terminal 18-amino-acid secretion signal peptide (SEC1), was obtained from Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA, cat. no. 87087).

    Techniques: Construct, Sequencing, Expressing, Microscopy, Standard Deviation, Transformation Assay, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Transfection, Western Blot, Control